Tag: Mopani

Hichilema had no plan to fix Zambia, it was all rhetoric

Hichilema had no plan to fix Zambia, it was all rhetoric Featured

What’s the problem with KCM and Mopani? What’s troubling Mr Hichilema’s government?

We would like to remind them that the delayed capitalisation of the two mining operations has been and is too painful for Zambia, especially for the residents of the Copperbelt Province. Statements to the effect that the delay is “because the government wants to safeguard the interests of Zambians” are hollow and deceitful because it is clear that Mr Hichilema and the UPND had no plan to “fix” any challenges Zambia was facing before they were elected, and now the problems have grown bigger.

On KCM, the trouble is that Vedanta has spent money and promised to be given back the mine based on agreed terms, including some Key Performance Indicators that Mr Hichilema’s government has included in the draft agreement.

The Key Performance Indicators include the following:

  1. An investment of more than $1 billion to develop KDMP;
  2. Salary and wage increments for KCM staff;
  3. Assume and pay-off debts owing to suppliers and contractors to KCM. These will be mainly debts incurred by the Provisional Liquidator and may be upwards of $300 million, excluding the electricity bill.

Should the Key Performance Indicators not be met, Vedanta will be compelled to offer its shares in KCM to ZCCM IH at a price. It would appear it is the asking price from Vedanta that might now be delaying the conclusion of the deal.

Vedanta is asking for upwards of $2.75 billion should the government invoke the Article to takeover the mines if Vedanta fails to attain certain Key Performance Indicators. It is incomprehensible that such an Article would even be considered because one wonders what safeguard measures have been put in place to safeguard GRZ/ZCCM IH/ and the people of Zambia, who are the ultimate beneficial shareholders in ZCCM IH, from Vedanta should Vedanta deliberately underperform so that ZCCM IH triggers the Articles for the Vedanta shares to be sold to ZCCM IH in the name of not meeting KPIs for Vedanta to automatically be owed $2.75 billion by ZCCM IH.

Should this information we have be true, then this imminent deal between Mr Hichilema’s government will surpass the Lungu government’s $1.5 billion deal with Glencore over Mopani.

Noticeably, there is something fishy about this deal and it can only be because Vedanta may have parted with some money to allow for such a bad deal against Zambians to be tabled for finalisation.

It cannot be wrong to assume that this deal might have an upside for some government officials pulling strings to make it happen. Your guess is as good as mine as to what level such deals are given the go-ahead.

As for Mopany Copper Mine, it appears that after almost concluding with a Chinese group, the government has reopened the bid process by allowing a possible last-minute entry to be considered for its acquisition.

Whatever the reasons, it is now two years since Mr Hichilema was elected into office to manage Zambia with the promise that “Bally will fix it”.

It appears Mr Hichilema either underestimated the challenges Zambia is and has been facing, or that may be “Bally” had no plan even after being given 16 years to prepare for the job.

Fred M’membe
President of Socialist Party

KCM/Mopani deals: A case of untimely inaction being worse than untimely action

KCM/Mopani deals: A case of untimely inaction being worse than untimely action Featured

Mr Hakainde Hichilema’s government promised to sort out the issues of Mopani and KCM by the end of July. Today the dates have been changed to “we don’t know when”.

Clearly, after several months of illusions and posturing over Mopani and KCM, reality has dawned on Mr Hichilema and his far-right UPND government and they are now running back and forth. Even the lies have dried up as the truth steadily seeps in through the cracks on these two transactions. They are lost and stuck, and literally dangling from the ceiling like bats in broad daylight.

What’s the problem? What’s troubling them?

On KCM, the trouble is that Vedanta has spent money and promised to be given back the mine based on agreed terms, including some Key Performance Indicators that Mr Hichilema’s government has included in the draft agreement.

The Key Performance Indicators include the following:

  1. An investment of more than $1 billion to develop KDMP;
  2. Salary and wage increments for KCM staff;
  3. Assume and pay-off debts owing to suppliers and contractors to KCM. These will be mainly debts incurred by the Provisional Liquidator and may be upwards of $300 million, excluding the electricity bill.

Should the Key Performance Indicators not be met, Vedanta will be compelled to offer its shares in KCM to ZCCM IH at a price. It would appear it is the asking price from Vedanta that might now be delaying the conclusion of the deal.

Vedanta is asking for upwards of $2.75 billion should the government invoke the Article to takeover the mines if Vedanta fails to attain certain Key Performance Indicators. It is incomprehensible that such an Article would even be considered because one wonders what safeguard measures have been put in place to safeguard GRZ/ZCCM IH/ and the people of Zambia, who are the ultimate beneficial shareholders in ZCCM IH, from Vedanta should Vedanta deliberately underperform so that ZCCM IH triggers the Articles for the Vedanta shares to be sold to ZCCM IH in the name of not meeting KPIs for Vedanta to automatically be owed $2.75 billion by ZCCM IH.

Should this information we have be true, then this imminent deal between Mr Hichilema’s government will surpass the Lungu government’s $1.5 billion deal with Glencore over Mopani.

Noticeably, there is something fishy about this deal and it can only be because Vedanta may have parted with some money to allow for such a bad deal against Zambians to be tabled for finalisation.

It cannot be wrong to assume that this deal might have an upside for some government officials pulling strings to make it happen. Your guess is as good as mine as to what level such deals are given the go-ahead.

As for MCM, it appears that after almost concluding with a Chinese group, the government has reopened the bid process by allowing a possible last-minute entry to be considered for its acquisition.

Whatever the reasons, it is now two years since Mr Hichilema was elected into office to manage Zambia with the promise that “Bally will fix it”. It appears Mr Hichilema either underestimated the challenges Zambia is and has been facing, or that may be “Bally” had no plan even after being given 16 years to prepare for the job.

The delayed capitalisation of the two mining operations has been and is too painful for Zambia, especially for the residents of the Copperbelt Province. Statements to the effect that the delay is “because the government wants to safeguard the interests of Zambians” are hollow and deceitful because it is clear that Mr Hichilema and the UPND had no plan to “fix” any challenges Zambia was facing before they were elected, and now the problems have grown bigger.

But armed with the painful history of the privatisation exercise and the activities of some negotiators/consultants who were implicated, we can only hope and pray that these seemingly continuous delays are not coordinated to enable a handful of business friends and partners to carve up the two mines, which have been the engines of the Copperbelt.

That is why, as responsible citizens, we strongly feel that we have a duty to demand total transparency in these two transactions to ensure that we prevent a situation where the same individuals with a checkered past or those connected to them, gain the right to take over the running of these prime ventures for a song or a mere fraction of their true value.

A repeat of thoughtless agreements, such as happened with the mine in Luanshya and how Grant Thornton – a firm where Mr Hichilema was at the helm of the consulting wing – got involved and was rewarded millions of dollars for the mine whose sale remains one of the enduring sources of tragedies in Luanshya and beyond, must never be allowed to happen again.

We must remain vigilant and not allow the swindlers of our mines during the sham privatisation exercise to return as messiahs of the Copperbelt. The architects of the existing poverty and squalor on the Copperbelt must not be given another opportunity to hoodwink our people into thinking that they have a solution to the issues surrounding Mopani/KCM. Let us not allow them to use public office for private gain.

Further, it is now inescapable for Bally to now explain whether he meant to “fix” the people of Zambia and not the problems they were facing, because clearly his delay in fixing the economy is fixing the poor people of Zambia. And the delay to “fix” the mines is indeed fixing the people of the Copperbelt. Its like the people of the Copperbelt are being punished for trusting Mr Hichilema and his campaign promises, which they have later learnt were built on total deception, lies and manipulation.

What is even worse, is Mr Hichilema’s lack of a sense of urgency in dealing with the prevailing desperate situation on the Copperbelt. He is taking his time as if he is not dealing with fellow citizens, his voters. But what more can one expect from an insensitive, greedy and plundering leadership? Our people must know that this leadership is about self-interest and the illicit amassing of wealth – they want to the first Zambian billionaires!

The suffering masses are not and will never be a priority. But we urge our people to remain resilient as we defend and protect our mineral resources and national wealth. And for Mr Hichilema and his league, to you we say, you have no justifiable reason to prolong the resolution of issues at Mopani/KCM. Look beyond your interests and rescue the masses. They have suffered enough. Have a heart; you don’t treat your fellow citizens this way.

As Lenin aptly put it, “Untimely inaction is worse than untimely action”.

Fred M’membe
President of the Socialist Party

The Plight of mine workers under the Mopani and Government on-going shareholding acquisition negotiations

The Plight of mine workers under the Mopani and Government on-going shareholding acquisition negotiations

Good morning ladies and gentlemen from the press. Welcome to today’s Press Briefing. The focus of this briefing is on the plight of the Zambian workers under Mopani Copper Mines – within the context of an anticipated take over of majority shareholding by the government owned ZCCM-IH.

  1. The Context
    It is by now apparent that Zambia today has one of the most reckless and clueless governments on the African continent in as far as macro-economic policy is concerned. The PF government has, within a short period of time, pushed Zambia’s debt to unsustainable levels, hopelessly seen the Kwacha drastically depreciate and set the economy on an inflationary path. As things stand today, and of course using COVID-19 as a scapegoat, the country is entering the first stages of debt default.
    Ladies and gentlemen, Zambia has three outstanding Eurobonds totalling $3 billion. Yesterday, the PF Government launched a vote with its Eurobond holders, proposing to defer interest payments on these three dollar-denominated bonds until April 14, 2021. This is supposed to be a first step to provide the country the necessary “breathing time” to create space for debt sustainability analysis and restructuring! In plain language, the country is unable to pay!

If you are a mineworker at Mopani, your question will be, where is this government going to find money to buy the shares owned today by Glencore – the majority shareholding in Mopani? Indeed the picture is gloomy:

  • The PF Government is clueless as to where the money for the first repayment of $750m Eurobond in September 2022 is going to come from.
  • In July this year, the IMF completed a virtual mission to Zambia to discuss the country’s request for emergency support. We do not see this support forthcoming given the lukewarm, arrogant and corrupt path followed to date on fiscal policy and consolidation.
  • With the 2021 general elections near, fiscal consolidation will mean losing votes. The experience of 2016 teaches us that the PF government will not sacrifice votes for the sake of macro-economic stability. They would rather default on debt payments and loose access to the international finance markets than surrender their parasitic hold on the taxpayer’s money.
  1. The Mopani saga As you might all be aware, Glencore is the majority owner of Mopani Copper Mines, with a 73.1% stake, the Canadian concern First Quantum Minerals owns 16.9%, and ZCCM-IH owns 10%. The Zambian government, through ZCCM-IH, submitted an expression of interest to acquire additional shares in Mopani Copper Mines and Glencore had given its approval to this move. In other words, Glencore is ready and willing to give up all its assets in Zambia. Depending on how this is negotiated, this could amount to anything between USD800 million to 1.500 billion! Again, where will this money come from?

Recently, the government announced that it had constituted a team to liaise with ZCCM-IH for the negotiations with Glencore and also that ZCCM-IH was in the process of engaging a transaction advisor.

Ladies and gentlemen, let us remind ourselves as to what has transpired in the recent past:

  • International civil society organisations have for years often accused Mopani of exploiting Zambia and not paying its dues tax obligations.
  • In April 2020 Glencore announced that it planned to halt operations at Mopani, and place the mine on care and maintenance. The Zambian government reacted angrily to this, claiming that they had not been given ample notice. A threat was made to revoke Glencore’s licence in the country.
  • In May 2020 Mopani announced that it would resume operations for 90 days.
  • On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) in a long running tax dispute with Mopani. The ruling ordered that Mopani pay a total of K240million in taxes assessed for the 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2009/10 tax years within 30 days, bringing to an end a dispute that has been running since 2010. It was brought to light that Mopani had under-priced copper sold to its shareholder company Glencore International AG (GIAG), thus reducing its tax liability.

Mopani is not to be trusted. Neither can the workers trust their own Zambian government!

  1. The Plight of the workers

Since Mopani was placed under care and maintenance, we have about 9,000 workers that are without employment. Their families are today enduring extreme hardships and poverty. The government has paid lip services to their plight – but nothing much beyond that.

We have another 11,000 employees serving under contractors. Their situation is also becoming acute by the day. Pay cuts are not uncommon.

Then we have about 6, 000 direct employees under Mopani whose future is now uncertain. Glencore is not investing in its Zambia assets anymore. The operations have to sustain themselves. Under this context, the services to employees have been drastically curtailed. This is often done without consultations and warning.

Similarly, the negotiations between Government and Glencore have to date excluded management and workers. The mineworkers are once more, like during the privatisation process, treated as collateral damage not worthy consulting.

This is the real plight of the workers. A crooked multinational corporation and a corrupt, clueless government are deciding upon their future. The workers are not on the negotiating table. They are not appreciated. These negotiations are therefore not about them. Quite to the contrary, they are against them.

  1. Demands for the workers

The Socialist Party, in its understanding, as a workers party, demands the following on behalf of the affected Mopani workers:

  1. All workers should be paid their outstanding dues and benefits upon ZCCM-IH taking over majority shareholding from Glencore.
  2. No workers’ dues and benefits should be held in Trust for the workers.
  3. Former employees of ZCCM under Mukuba Pension Scheme would also need to be paid out what is owned to them. The whole pension scheme for miners is turning out to be a huge drain for the workers and not helping out to sustain their livelihoods after employment.
  4. New contracts will need to be signed for all workers upon a fundamental shift in the shareholding structure.
  5. Mineworkers and management must be represented in the negotiations between Government and Glencore

By: The General Secretary, Dr. Cosmas Musumali

Socialist Party Office, Kawama, Kitwe